Stonegarden

ACLU attorney Billy Peard: “The local law, the local criminal justice systems are already in place. We don’t need additional assistance from ICE in our jail to keep our local community safe. There’s no role for ICE.”

Local activists with Free the Children Coalition, consisting of people from at least a dozen activist groups and nonprofits, gathered right outside the Pima County Board of Supervisors’ Aug. 7 meeting to demand the Supervisors deny a $1.2 million federal grant with the Operation Stonegarden Program, which supports collaboration between federal immigration enforcement agencies and local law enforcement. 

Pima County and local jurisdictions have been participating in the program and receiving the federal grants for more than 12 years. Until Trump became president and the efforts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ramped up, Stonegarden was a consent agenda item, approved without debate. 

In that time, the county accepted about $16.5 million in federal grant funds and of that, $10.4 million went to overtime to deploy deputies into underserved rural areas that Pima County Sheriff Mark Napier says are heavily used for drug trafficking. About $6 million went to equipment.

On Feb. 20, a crowd showed up to protest Stonegarden’s annual renewal. The supervisors voted 3-2 to accept the federal grant, with Supervisor Ramón Valadez stipulating five conditions of acceptance. The supervisors were revisiting Stonegarden on Aug. 7 to talk about whether the stipulations had been met and whether to accept the funding. 

The stipulations are: making sure the grant covers all overtime costs associated with Stonegarden activities; creating county oversight; ensuring there’s a process for collecting appropriate data and information; developing a policy on how local law enforcement interact with federal immigration agents; and creating a committee to oversee the potential issue of racial profiling.

Napier said his office has complied with all five conditions previously set, which was confirmed in a memorandum by County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry. Napier said they also created an anti-racial-profiling policy, and he’s meeting with the American Civil Liberties Union to see where it can be improved.

Per the last stipulation, the county created the Community Law Enforcement Partnership Commission to request data, review it and make recommendations to the Board. Each board member had the opportunity to appoint two members to the board, but Supervisor Ally Miller didn’t appoint anyone, and Supervisor Steve Christy only appointed one member. As well, Napier and the Tohono O’odham Nation Department of Public Safety Director Richard Saunders are on the commission.

But not everyone agrees with that assertion that the five stipulations have been met. Kristen Randall, vice-chairperson on the commission, said she believes Napier did his part to meet the five conditions, but through no fault of his own, there are two yet to be completed: the collection of appropriate data from all participating jurisdictions and, although the commission has indeed formed, they haven’t received all the data or had time to review what they have received.

The commission received data form jurisdictions including the police departments in Marana, Oro Valley, Sahuarita and Tucson. But the Tohono O’odham and South Tucson departments turned in incomplete data, all of which the commission only received during their last meeting.

Huckelberry said that because the commission had been formed, although they haven’t been able to make any recommendations yet, the conditions have been fulfilled. And he recommended that the board vote to accept the funds.

Randall asked the Board not accept the funds until both of those conditions had been fully met, sighting a July 15 memo from Huckelberry. In regards to not receiving complete data, he wrote: “...obtaining useful information has been problematic and if this request for data continues to be as difficult as it has been to date I will recommend that the Board terminate the Stonegarden Grant.”

Besides an end to Stonegarden, Free the Children Coalition were also demanding an end to ICE’s presence in the Pima County Jail. Billy Peard, an attorney with the ACLU’s Tucson office, says ending Stonegarden and removing ICE from the jail is really about completely ending the collaboration between local law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement. He says due to Stonegarden, a greater number of people end up in the county jail, and ICE agents being in the jail completes a circle of collaboration between federal and local agencies that leads to more undocumented people, with varying degrees of charges, being sent to ICE detainers. 

ICE agents have been in the Pima County Jail since early 2017, shortly after Napier, a Republican, took the place of Chris Naños, a Democrat who was appointed to job but lost reelection to Napier. The way it works is if Pima County is about to release someone, but that person has an ICE detainer, immigration enforcement agents are waiting there to take them to an ICE detention center.

“We’ve heard that many of the folks are dangerous that are subject to ICE detainers; that cannot be further from the truth,” Peard said. “The local law, the local criminal justice systems are already in place. We don’t need additional assistance from ICE in our jail to keep our local community safe. There’s no role for ICE.”

Peard argues that involving immigration enforcement officials in matters of local public safety means people are less likely to report dangerous crimes due to fear of deportation and/or being racially targeted.

Although many Latinos are not immigrants and many immigrants are not undocumented, they may fear for friends or family members who are undocumented. A drop in Latinos reporting crime has been well-documented since Trump took office. National Public Radio reported that major cities across California saw a drop in Latinos reporting spousal abuse. And the website FiveThirtyEight.com reported Latinos in large cities across the country were reporting fewer crimes, including Los Angeles, Houston, Dallas, Denver and Philadelphia. 

Napier says it’s not true the grant money is used to deport undocumented immigrants with no serious criminal history. He said the grant is about interdicting transnational crime organizations.

“No one can dispute the fact that we’re a major trafficking corridor for both human trafficking and drug trafficking,” Napier said. “I would be remiss if I did not take federal resources to help me combat those issues.”

As far as ICE agents in the Pima County Jail, Napier says less than 4 percent of inmates have ICE detainers, and in the last six months 1.2 percent of inmates have been turned over to ICE. He says 98 percent of inmates turned over to ICE are there on “very serious charges” and that if he weren’t turning them over to ICE, he’d be forced to set them free. When asked why the jail would be releasing inmates who are there on serious charges, he said they may have federal charges that go beyond the state-level crime that landed them in jail.

Napier says that through the Stonegarden collaboration, he’s a strategic partner and Homeland Security Officials have to listen to him, adding that he told HHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to tell the president, “Shut up about illegal immigration.”

“I’m not interested in illegal immigration,” he said. “I’m a law enforcement public safety professional. I’m interested in what has a detrimental effect to public safety in our county, and that is drugs and human trafficking, the transnational crime threat but also the terrible plight and the human rights violation that the porous border has. My deputies recover about 200 bodies a year in the deserts of this county. That’s a human rights tragedy.”

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.