I know it is an off election year, and that there is not a lot of interest in what the Town is doing, but we better keep a close eye on this budget cycle.

The town manager has presented a budget that is balanced only if the council agrees to $3 million in increased and new taxes and fees. There has been no sacrifice by the town; instead they are considering coming to us for more money.

Oro Valley is considering an employee raise/bonus.  Other cities are considering furloughs and layoffs. Oro Valley pays 100 percent of employee health benefits and 75 percent of dependent benefits. Oro Valley gives 68 policemen a take- home vehicle. Oro Valley has eight policemen assigned to a task force, meaning that they don’t even work in Oro Valley.

Oro Valley has eight motorcycle policemen, while all of Pima County has only six. Oro Valley gives employees a holiday for Christmas Eve, New Year’s Eve, and their birthday. Oro Valley has budgeted over $160,000 for training and travel ($36,000 just for mayor and council training). Oro Valley does the Amphi District job of providing security to the schools with seven school resource officers (SRO’s).

Before you come to the citizens for more money, you need to clean up your own house. You need to make some sacrifices. Instruct the town manager to present a balanced budget without an increase to the citizens. If the council decides that the sacrifices are too much, they can then attempt to raise more money.  It is the responsibility of the elected officials, not the bureaucrats, to make theses decisions. They can be held accountable.

How much money can be saved by having the employees participate in their health care expenses, eliminating three holidays, eliminating the Special Task Force, reducing the motorcycle detachment to four, eliminating the take home vehicles, and reducing the training/travel expenditures, reducing the SROs to one at each high school? 

Until you ask these questions, among many others, don’t attempt to raise taxes and fees.

(1) comment


I find it outrageous that OV has not taken any steps to reduce its operating budget, not even a token symbolic gesture, when it is being faced with such a budget deficit. Most OV residents are feeling the pinch of the current economy and for the town to consider raising taxes before even attempting any operating cost reductions is not fair, not thought out, and maybe not necessary. The travel budget smells like a pure boon doggle. You can't tell me in this day and age, with video tele-conferencing, and on-line training, that the travel budget cannot be reduced. Fleet management also requires examination. Considering response time, geographic boundaries, servicing (based on mileage), and fuel costs, I find it hard to believe that it is cost effective to let every police officer have a take home vehicle. I think a case can be made for officers on 24 hour call-out, but no one else.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.