It should come as no surprise to people who read this column, I think our country needs stronger gun regulations and more effective enforcement of the regulations we already have. That’s what you’d expect from a proud, unrepentant liberal like me.

I could wax eloquent about reasons, emotional and intellectual, why we need stricter gun regulation and list specific steps we should take to keep guns from falling into the hands of criminals and the mentally ill. But that wouldn’t move anyone’s thinking an inch one way or the other. Some readers would nod their heads in vigorous agreement, others would accuse me of wanting to take away their guns and their freedoms, and some would simply shrug and say, “I don’t know. It’s just too complicated.”

Instead, I want to take another approach. Let’s step outside our raging battle over gun ownership and look at how another country approaches the issue. No, not a country in Europe. I can already hear the cries of “We don’t want to be like Europe!” And not a third world country where some autocratic leader has every reason to fear an armed populace. Let’s look at gun laws in Israel, a democracy which is in a constant state of military readiness, where its citizens have every reason to fear violent attacks. If arming citizens is the best way to secure people’s safety, Israel seems like just the kind of place that would encourage a heavily armed citizenry. Which is why Israel’s gun laws may come as a surprise. Most people don’t own guns, because few people meet the strict qualifications. And licensed gun owners usually are allowed only one pistol.

Israelis can only get a gun license if they reached a reasonably high rank in the military or they can demonstrate the need to own a firearm. If they’re in a business where they have reason to fear being harmed – full time jewelry dealers, people who deal in large quantities of cash or valuables and licensed drivers of public transportation are common examples – they can own one. So can people who live in truly dangerous areas. Licensed hunters can own guns as well. Some Israelis can have guns as souvenirs or if they’re handed down from family members, but only with proper documentation and not in quantity.

Demonstrating the need for a gun is just the beginning of the process. People who want to own a firearm have to go through extensive background checks to make sure they don’t have criminal records and they’re in good physical and mental health. That includes a personal interview to make sure there are no obvious red flags that might indicate a firearm in that person’s hands would be a danger to others. If all the checks go well, the prospective owner next has to pass a weapons training course before a gun license is issued. Then every three years, the owner has to re-qualify for the license.

You won’t see gun arsenals in Israeli homes, or even multiple weapons. In most cases, a license is only good for one firearm, usually a pistol. And when it comes to ammunition, gun owners can only buy 50 rounds a year. It’s no wonder the horrific mass shootings we’ve experienced in recent weeks are nearly unheard of in Israel.

I’m not suggesting we should adopt Israel’s gun policies. Many people in this country own guns - often lots of guns - and that’s not about to change. But it’s worth our while to take a short break from shouting at one another and recognize there are other reasonable ways to approach gun ownership. If a country like Israel with all its legitimate security concerns doesn’t ascribe to the notion, “the more guns the better,” maybe we can figure out reasonable ways to regulate sales and licensing to keep guns in the hands of people who will use them wisely and safely and out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.

(Editor’s Note: Dave Safier is a regular contributor to Blog for Arizona.)

(3) comments

Lost Target

RE: Demonstrating the need for a gun

My Second Amendment rights is all I need. The same right confirmed by a Supreme Court ruling.

All that additonal rules do is make law abiding gun owners jump through hoops. Ask the citizens of Chicago or Washington D.C. how that's working for them. Gun crime down? No!

A solution is for stronger laws against the unlawful use of firearms in a crime and a court system that sends unlawful users to jail (no plea bargaining).


Considering the Second Amendment is already weighted down with so much gun control, its hard to see it for what it was intended for. You have the RIGHT to bear arms. It never said if you jump through this hoop or that hoop. But they are what they are and thats not the discussion here.

As a reaction too many people think cracking down on a problem is the answer. I think just the opposite is true. If more people had guns those using them for crimes might think twice for fear of bullets actually coming back at them.

I also believe more money in mental health care and child development would bring down violent crimes. Lets face it, people committing crimes with guns fall into one of three categories. Either they have some kind of mental illness or they were abused or neglected as a child. Now by neglected I mean to include parents who don't take a proactive roll in raising their kids and not just roommates who they cloth and feed. If the parents aren't doing that then there should be some way to do it outside the home.

There is also too much leniency in the prison systems. Why fear going there when all the amenities of outside can be found inside. Cable TV, Conjugal visits and no real punishment for their crimes. Lets actually punish prisoners with work details, make them go to counseling and take away the electronic babysitters (TVs) and sex.

More gun control is not going to fix the problem. How many gun crimes are committed using a gun they purchased legally? I notice that's not being brought up by the people who want to crack down on the gun laws.


I agree with Dave, we need to have qualifications like they do in Israel. Israel is a bit liberal, and liberals need to be restricted in regards to most everything. So, in order to own a firearm we will have a double edged test. 1) you must be able to show a history of holding conservative positions. 2) if you have a record of holding leftist positions you cannot own a gun. All the recent mass killers are leftists.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.