Username or Email
Based on the article, the annexation should have failed.
While the 50% of valuation mark was easily surpassed, the 50% plus 1 approval did not. According to the article 273 parcels approved out of 548. 50% plus 1 of 548 would mean that 275 parcels would have had to of approved the annexation. Is it a typo?
Did the District simply stop trying to get yes votes when they got exactly to what they thought was the required tally?
Thursday, February 7, 2013, 1:45 pm
Signing in from multiple locations may be the cause.