More summery than solemn
Photo courtesy of Columbia Pictures, Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon with Ayelet Zurer as Vittoria Vetra in Dan Brown's 'Angels & Demons', directed by Ron Howard.

Associated Press

Angels & Demons

Rated PG-13 for sequences of violence, disturbing images and thematic material. Running time: 138 minutes. Two stars out of four.

Blessedly, "Angels & Demons” is more entertaining and less self-serious than its predecessor, the dense and dreary yet enormously successful "The Da Vinci Code.”

In adapting another of author Dan Brown's religious-mystery page turners, director Ron Howard wisely gave in to its beat-the-clock thriller elements, which makes for a more enjoyable summer movie experience. The brouhaha has long since abated among Catholics, albinos, "Da Vinci Code” purists, what have you, and all that's left is air-conditioned escapism.

But its twists, turns and revelations are just as ridiculous as those in the first film — perhaps even more so — and it breezes through arcane details with just as much dizzying speed.

Besides Howard, the key players are back from that 2006 international hit, including Tom Hanks as Harvard professor and symbologist Robert Langdon and Akiva Goldsman as screenwriter (with David Koepp collaborating on the script). Joining them are Ewan McGregor, Stellan Skarsgaard and Armin Mueller-Stahl among the estimable supporting cast, all of whom have enjoyed the benefits of stronger material but manage to supply gravitas nonetheless.

Although "Angels & Demons” preceded "The Da Vinci Code” in book form, the film is positioned as a sequel to take advantage of the strained relationship between Langdon and the Vatican — only this time, it's his expertise the folks there reluctantly need.

With the pope dead and the College of Cardinals about to meet in conclave to choose a replacement, a secret society known as the Illuminati has kidnapped the four likeliest candidates. Howard and cinematographer Salvatore Totino, who also shot "The Da Vinci Code,” cloak all these proceedings in dark, ominous shadows, and Hans Zimmer's score rather obviously adds to the feeling of foreboding.

Langdon is brought in to decipher clues at various churches and historical sites throughout Rome to prevent the killing of the cardinals, one every hour, leading to a bomb explosion at the Vatican. He gets help along the way from Vittoria Vetra (Ayelet Zurer), an Italian scientist who worked at the lab where the combustible vial of anti-matter was stolen for the planned attack. Her arrival also allows for such standard action-picture dialogue as, "Can you deactivate the device?”

Never mind that Vittoria is sexy and mysterious, not middle-aged and frumpy. (And we gotta say, Hanks is looking pretty good here, too. The first time we see him, he's tanned and trim, swimming laps in a Speedo in the Harvard pool.) Never mind that the time frame is impossible — that they must dash across the city at night, with its narrow streets and tourist traps packed with visitors, in time to stop each killing. And never mind that one person appears to be responsible for orchestrating these elaborate and very public deaths.

But wait, we haven't even gotten to the most laughable part of the story yet! We won't give it away entirely for those who haven't read the book. We'll just say it involves an exploding helicopter and a crucial character parachuting out of it just in time. Because it is summer, after all, despite the aura of religious solemnity.


Rated R for language. 93 min. One and a half stars out of four.

It's easy to forget that Jennifer Aniston truly can act.

It's easy to get caught up in her sunny looks, in the tabloid frenzy of her off-screen persona, and lose sight of the fact that, when given the opportunity in small, meaty films like "The Good Girl” and "Friends With Money” and even "Office Space,” she can reveal some real substance and depth. You want that for Aniston here, too, but the script from Stephen Belber doesn't give her enough room to breathe and shine.

A playwright and screenwriter ("Tape,” "The Laramie Project”) directing for the first time, Belber surprisingly goes heavy on the quirk in this quirky romantic comedy and never develops a romance that feels believable. Everything about the relationship between Aniston's Sue Claussen and Steve Zahn's Mike Cranshaw feels contrived.

They never make sense together as a couple; then again, neither of them is terribly well fleshed-out. Mike is in a state of arrested development, living and working at the motel owned by his parents (Fred Ward and an underused Margo Martindale). Sue is inexplicably closed off; we learn a little about her from her charity work with the homeless, but otherwise we never understand why she's so stoic and reluctant to fall in love.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.